"Open" in the age of Google a rant
25-Mar-2011 - Open source development and production models has multiple definitions. Don't expect Google to change its current model to a traditional Open Source model. That's not realistic in the age of open sourced consumer hardware gone mainstream. Perhaps Google should clearly define their approach to Open Source. I'm dissapointed in the inconsistency with Google's open vs. closed policy like the next guy but I think journalists really need to do their homework before "retweeting" news rather than research.- Honeycomb is a fork of regular Android Source.
- Forked version has been released to select OEM's
. Don't forget that just as any 3rd party can fork android into a proprietary or sell their release.
- Android software stack has never been open (in the traditional bottom up sense). It always gets released once its baked. They claim Honeycomb isn't baked due to rush to compete with the iPad 2.
- For Application developers, the SDK was released months ago, when Google felt it was baked. Am I missing something?
- http://source.android.com/about/philosophy.html (Philosophy and Goals)
- http://source.android.com/source/licenses.html (licenses)
|
"Google loves to characterize itself as 'open' and iOS and iPhone as 'closed.' We find this a bit disingenuous and clouding the real difference between our two approaches," Jobs is quoted.
more by Steve Jobs
|